top of page

Still Waiting to Move to France? You May Be Waiting for Something That Doesn’t Exist

  • Aug 25
  • 5 min read


There is a particular stage in a French project where people become very good at preparing. They read. They research. They make spreadsheets. They compare regions. They save properties. They check tax rules, healthcare, airports, weather, train times and whether the Thursday market in a village they have never visited is any good.

 

All of this is useful. Until it isn’t. Because sometimes preparation quietly turns into postponement. You are no longer gathering information because you need it. You are gathering information because making the decision feels considerably more uncomfortable.

 

I say this without judgment. I am perfectly capable of turning “I should decide” into a highly sophisticated research project myself. But after years of watching people plan moves to France, I keep seeing the same three things getting in the way.

 

“I’m waiting for the right time”

This one is wonderfully reasonable. Once the children finish school. Once work settles down. After the next bonus. When the housing market improves. When interest rates fall. When the exchange rate behaves itself. When the political situation becomes clearer.

 

The problem is that life is extremely uncooperative about providing a completely empty calendar. Something always replaces the thing you were waiting to finish.

 

That does not mean you should throw caution out of the window and announce at dinner tonight that everybody is moving to France next Tuesday. It means recognising the difference between a real constraint and an indefinitely movable deadline.

 

If your child genuinely needs to finish school, that is a constraint. If you cannot afford the move yet, that is a constraint. If you simply keep thinking that next year will somehow feel more comfortable, that may be something else.

 

A useful question is not “Is now the perfect time?” It is: What exactly has to be true before I can move forward? Put those things on paper. Make them concrete. If the answer is “sell the house, secure €500,000 and finish work in September 2027,” excellent. You now have a plan.

 

If the answer remains vaguely “when things settle down,” you may be waiting for a bus that does not exist.

 

“I need to remove the risk”

This one usually arrives disguised as more research. Surely, if you investigate long enough, you can eliminate the possibility of making the wrong choice.

 

Unfortunately, no. You can reduce risk enormously. You can take proper tax advice, understand the visa process, survey the property, investigate planning issues, check flood zones, visit in winter, talk to local people and make sure your finances work.

 

You absolutely should do those things. But at some point you encounter the rather irritating fact that major life decisions contain uncertainty. You may discover after moving that you prefer another village. A neighbour may annoy you. Your favourite restaurant may close. The perfect local doctor may retire. The exchange rate may move against you three weeks after completion because apparently international currency markets did not receive your moving schedule.

You cannot research those possibilities away. What you can do is build resilience into the decision.

 

Keep a financial cushion. Avoid stretching the property budget to the last euro. Rent first if you are deeply uncertain about an area. Preserve some flexibility in your plans. Understand what you would do if Plan A turned into Plan B.

 

The objective is not to create a move in which nothing can go wrong.

 

The objective is to create one in which something can go wrong without destroying everything else.

 

That is a rather different standard, and a much more achievable one.

 

“I just need to find the best place”

France is particularly dangerous for perfectionists because there are simply too many good options.

 

You can spend two years comparing Provence with the Dordogne, the Charente with the Lot, Brittany with the Pays Basque, and then begin comparing individual towns inside each one. By the time you reach villages, you may need another spreadsheet.

 

The assumption behind all this is understandable: somewhere out there is the correct answer. The perfect region. The perfect town. The perfect house.

 

I have some bad news. There probably isn’t one. There are likely several places where you could build a very good life, each with different advantages and compromises.

One may give you better restaurants but less land. Another gives you a magnificent house but makes the airport annoying. A third is cheaper but quieter in winter. The famous town may be beautiful and expensive, while the village fifteen minutes away may actually suit your daily life better.

 

Eventually the question has to change from “Which place is best?” to “Which place works well enough for the life I want?”

 

That sounds like lowering your standards. It isn’t. It is how most good decisions are made.

 

“Good enough” deserves a better reputation

We tend to hear “good enough” as slightly depressing. As if, after years of dreaming about France, I am now advising you to shrug your shoulders and buy a bungalow beside a roundabout. Not quite.

 

Good enough means meeting the things that genuinely matter while accepting that some other things will be compromises. Perhaps walkability matters enormously, but having two hectares does not. Perhaps healthcare access is non-negotiable, while an airport within forty minutes would merely be convenient. Perhaps you need an active town in winter but can happily sacrifice the panoramic view.

 

Once you know those distinctions, decisions become considerably easier. And that is why I keep coming back to the same starting point: before asking where to live, ask what kind of life you are trying to build.

The Tuesday morning market matters. So does the café you can walk to, the hospital you can reach, the friends you might make and the amount of driving you are willing to do. Those things are much better guides than somebody else’s ranking of the “ten best villages in France.”

 

You don’t need certainty. You need enough clarity

At some stage, every serious French project has to move from research into commitment. That may mean booking the exploratory trip. Choosing the three areas you will genuinely investigate. Starting the visa process. Putting your house on the market. Setting the date.

 

Fear does not magically disappear when the moment arrives. In my experience, people simply become clear enough that the remaining uncertainty no longer gets the deciding vote. So if your France project has been sitting in roughly the same place for a year, perhaps the next step is not another article, another Facebook group or another evening looking at houses online.

 

Ask yourself three questions instead. Am I waiting for something specific, or merely for the perfect moment? Am I managing risk, or trying to eliminate uncertainty? And am I looking for a place that fits me, or for a mythical best place that may not exist?

 

Your answers may tell you rather more than another hundred property listings ever will.




Comments


bottom of page